The Influence of Tradition over the Community of Faith: An Old Testament Perspective | Chapter 01 | Current Research in Education and Social Studies Vol. 1
In this article, (The Influence of
Tradition over the Community of Faith: a Biblical Perspective), the author
tries to understand the way the religious tradition influences the community of
faith. The importance of the subject is demonstrated by the impact which a
tradition has upon a certain community. The consequences can be serious. As far
as the consequences for the Jewish community in history, it is showed that,
even though they had lost their country many times, they miraculously preserved
their identity. The author argues that tradition kept the community on track,
by preserving some customs, practices that have been passed on from generation
to generation. The main responsibility for this was given to the leaders of the
community: the kings, the priests, and the prophets. When the leaders abandoned
the Yahwist tradition, the community lost its identity. Another role of the
tradition in relationship to the community is to educate the community. The Old
Testament presents situations in which the geographical territory – the Land of
Israel, reacted against the Jewish community in order to motivate it to keep
the tradition. Two kinds of reactions of the land are presented against the
community: The land had the power of driving out the Jews from their country,
and the land can exercise pressure upon the community while the community was
living into the land, in order to correct its attitude towards the tradition.
We have the case of the Samaritan community, who did not keep the tradition of
the land and experienced difficulties. As far as the attitude of the New
Testament towards other communities living in the land, it was given the
example of Jesus who had a favorable attitude towards Samaritans. In some instances Jesus recommends some
Samaritans as models to be followed by Jews. Even Jesus himself is identified
in Christianity as being the Good Samaritan.
Author(s) Details
Mihai
Handaric
Department
of Pentecostal Theology, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, “Aurel
Vlaicu” University of Arad, Romania.
Comments
Post a Comment