Creativity versus Innovativeness: Exploring the Differences between the Two Constructs May Lead to Greater Innovation in Large Firms | Chapter 10 | Current Perspective to Economics and Management Vol. 3
Several individuals from top management
seem to be confused about the difference between creativity and innovativeness.
[1] suggests that while innovation begins with creative ideas, creativity by
individuals and teams is only a starting point for innovation. Individual
creativity is necessary but not sufficient to yield breakthrough innovation in
organizations. This can sometimes cause confusion in employee development
efforts and actions taken by management. Companies often look for ways to hire
and retain creative employees and at the same time they are also interested in
establishing a creative environment for knowledge workers… but should
creativity be the primary focus? These firms hope that creativity enhancing
steps will eventually lead to greater innovation and therefore help it to
achieve sustained competitive advantage. This paper attempts to demonstrate
that there are potentially other dimensions beyond creativity related to
innovativeness, which should be considered at the individual level in order to
foster innovation in firms. Empirical results in this study support the idea
that intrinsic motivational orientation, sociability and political astuteness
are enhancers to employee innovativeness while perfection seeking behavior
detracts employee innovativeness. These findings may serve to extend Amabile’s
[1] componential framework to center on the “innovativeness” construct versus
creativity to help explain how firms need to hire, cultivate and retain the
right talent.
Author(s) Details
John Cocco
Lally School of Management
& Technology Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York, USA.
Majdi Anwar Quttainah
College of Business
Administration, Kuwait University, Kuwait.
View Volume: http://bp.bookpi.org/index.php/bpi/catalog/book/101
Comments
Post a Comment