Leaf Amino Acids and Anatomical Traits of Drought Tolerant vs Sensitive Genotypes of Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) under Elevated Levels of Water Stress | Chapter 03 | Advances in Agriculture and Fisheries Research Vol. 1
Many plants accumulate compatible
osmolytes at high levels in plant cells such as amino acids and/or develop
special epidermal cell bladders which may serve as external water reservoirs
and having small and thick-walled cells in response to water deficit. The
objectives of the present investigation were: (i) to study effects of water
stress on the anatomical traits and accumulation of free amino acids in quinoa
leaves and (ii) to describe differences among drought tolerant and sensitive
genotypes in such traits following the imposition of water deficit. A field
experiment was carried out in the growing season 2015/2016, using a split plot
design with five replications. Main plots were allotted to three irrigation
regimes, i.e. well watering (WW) [95% field capacity (FC)], moderate water
stress (WS) [65% FC] and severe water stress (SWS) [35% FC] and sub plots to
five genotypes. Mean squares due to genotypes, irrigation regimes and their
interaction were significant (p≤0.01) for studied leaf free amino acids and
anatomical traits. Water stress caused a significant decrease in leaf thickness
under WS and SWS, upper and lower epidermis under WS, palisade and spongy
layers under SWS, but caused a significant increase in palisade and spongy
layers under WS and upper and lower epidermis under SWS. The genotype CICA-17
(tolerant) had the thickest leaf and upper epidermis and second thickest lower
epidermis, palisade and spongy layers. Contents of each amino acid were
significantly increased due to water stress, except Leucine. Increases in amino
acid content increased by increasing severity of water stress. Maximum increase
(109.6%) was shown by Threonine under SWS, but minimum (8.08%) was by Arginine
under WS. Under SWS, the tolerant genotype CICA-17 showed the highest mean
increase percentage (47.9%) in total amount of amino acids relative to WW; it
showed the highest increase in all amino acids, especially Proline, Methionine
and Phenylalanine.
Author(s) Details
Author(s) Details
Dr. Ahmed Medhat Mohamed
Al-Naggar
Department of Agronomy,
Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo University, Egypt.
Dr. Rabie Mohamed Abd
El-Salam
Department of Agronomy,
Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo University, Egypt.
Dr. Ayman E. Badran
Plant Breeding Unit,
Department of Genetic Resources, Desert Research Center, Cairo, Egypt.
Mai M. El-Moghazi
Plant Breeding Unit,
Department of Genetic Resources, Desert Research Center, Cairo, Egypt.
View Volume: http://bp.bookpi.org/index.php/bpi/catalog/book/138
Comments
Post a Comment