Impact of Finger Millet Varieties on Yield and Income of the Farmers in Mandya District, Karnataka | Chapter 4 | Emerging Issues and Development in Economics and Trade Vol. 4
The
Finger Millet (Eleusine coracana L.) is a staple food in southern Karnataka
popularly known and called as ‘Ragi’ in kannada vernacular language. To enhance
its productivity the University of Agricultural Sciences, Bengaluru (UASB) is
engaged in evolving location specific, farmer need based farm technologies
through its Zonal Agricultural Research Stations (ZARS) spread over in Southern
Karnataka since its inception 1965. To its credit, it has developed and
released many farm technologies for the farmers to adopt. Among these, the
improved high yielding Finger Millet variety KMR-204 was one. It has genetic
advantages over the other local varieties, such as high yielding, blast
tolerance, short duration and preferred for late sowing when rains are delayed.
Such improved variety was released and recommended during 2011 for wider
adoption for the growers in southern dry zone of Karnataka. Since then, many
growers had adopted the variety. After lapse of 5 years of its release, the
UASB was interested in to find out the performance of the technology on the
farmers field and their perception in gaining economic returns when compared to
other local varieties. From this backdrop the study was conducted during 2016
in Mandya district, Karnataka, where there is large area under the Finger
Millet crop. The district has 7 taluks, from each taluk 2 Finger Millet growing
villages were selected. From 14 villages, 210 respondents who have adopted both
KMR-204 and Indaf-9 varieties (Before) were selected randomly and interviewed
and information was collected. A research design ‘Before and After’ was adopted
to compare the results. The findings of the study reveal that, the KMR-204 had
given more grain and straw yield compared to that of Indaf-9 variety used
before under both rainfed and irrigated conditions. However, the difference in
obtaining grain and straw yields was non-significant. Similarly, in case of
obtaining net income, though the respondents obtained relatively more income
from KMR-204 compared to Indaf-9, the difference was non-significant. Thus the
alternate hypothesis is rejected by accepting the null hypothesis. The
respondents had favourable perception, with high attributional quotient (0.92)
towards KMR-204, implying continued
usage of variety. To conclude that the respondents obtained almost equal yields
and income from the from the selected Finger millet varieties. The respondents
had favourable perception towards
KMR-204 variety.
Author(s) Details
Dr. D. Raghupathi
Department of Extension, University of Agricultural Sciences, Zonal Agricultural Research Station, VC Farm Mandya, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Mr. M. Venkatesha
Department of Horticulture, College of Agriculture, University of Agricultural Sciences, VC Farm Mandya, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Mr. C. Umashankara
Directorate of Research, GKVK, University of Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
View Book: - http://bp.bookpi.org/index.php/bpi/catalog/book/159
Author(s) Details
Dr. D. Raghupathi
Department of Extension, University of Agricultural Sciences, Zonal Agricultural Research Station, VC Farm Mandya, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Mr. M. Venkatesha
Department of Horticulture, College of Agriculture, University of Agricultural Sciences, VC Farm Mandya, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Mr. C. Umashankara
Directorate of Research, GKVK, University of Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
View Book: - http://bp.bookpi.org/index.php/bpi/catalog/book/159
Comments
Post a Comment