Determining the Effect of Injection Dexmedetomidine for Prevention of Pain due to Propofol Injection and Comparing it with Injection Lignocaine | Chapter 02 | New Horizons in Medicine and Medical Research Vol. 1
Background: Local pain after a Propofol injection is a common occurrence. Different ways have been tried to alleviate the discomfort, but they have had mixed results. The purpose of this study was to examine the efficacy of injection Dexmedetomidine 0.2 mcg/kg against injection Lignocaine 0.2 mg/kg in preventing pain caused by Propofol injection.
Method: The study
was started with written informed consent from the participants after receiving
clearance from the Institutional Ethics Committee. In a randomised prospective
trial, 60 ASA I and II patients between the ages of 20 and 60 years, of either
sexe, were randomly assigned to one of two groups for elective procedures under
general anaesthesia.
Injection
Dexmedetomidine 0.2mcg/kg in Group I (Dexmedetomidine group), and
Injection
Lignocaine 0.2 mg/kg in Group II (Lignocaine group).
In 5 mL normal
saline, both were diluted. A 20 G cannula was used to secure the IV line, and a
pneumatic tourniquet was used to apply venous occlusion to the forearm, which
was inflated to 70mm Hg for 1 minute. After the study drug was injected, the
tourniquet was removed and 25 percent of the predicted dose of Injection
Propofol was administered intravenously over 10 seconds. The severity of pain
was assessed using the McCrirrick and Hunter scale, after which the remaining
Propofol and neuromuscular blocking drug were administered. Anesthesia was
maintained with Oxygen, Nitrous oxide, and Isoflurane on intermittent positive
pressure ventilation with Bain's circuit after endotracheal intubation. Muscle
relaxant injection Vecuronium was utilised.
Author(S) Details
Manisha A. Sapate
Department of Anaesthesiology, YCM Hospital, Pimpri, Pune, India.
View Book:- https://stm.bookpi.org/NHMMR-V1/article/view/6167
Comments
Post a Comment