Study on Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Manual Suture and Different Models of Mechanical Suture in the Mimicking of Bariatric Surgery in Swine | Chapter 23 | New Horizons in Medicine and Medical Research Vol. 1
Background: Differences in surgeon ability sparked the development of technologies that, by overcoming individual differences, allow for proper technique execution and the greatest possible final result. A procedure must be replicated consistently by the majority of surgeons in order for it to be adopted and recognised as effective.
The goal of this
study was to compare the results of manual sutures vs mechanical sutures in the
treatment of gastroenteroanastomosis and enteroanastomosis in swine from the
perspective of anatomic pathology utilising different models of linear
mechanical staplers.
The researchers
employed 36 healthy, adult male Sus scrofa domesticus pigs that weighed between
20.7 and 25.5 kg. Group A, manual suture with Polysorb® 3-0 wire; group B,
80-shear linear stapler (Covidien® Gia 8038-S); group C, 75-shear linear
stapler (Ethicon® Tlc 75); and group D, 75-shear linear stapler (Resource® Yq
75-3); and group E, 75-shear linear stapler (Resource® Yq 75-3).
The formation of
foreign body granuloma in the gastroenteroanastomosis and enteroanastomosis was
observed in 88.9% of the swine that underwent manual suture and none of the
swine that underwent stapling during the histopathological analysis. There was
also a statistical difference in the degree of inflammation between swine from
Group A and those from Groups B, C, and D, with the latter being more extreme
in those swine that received manual suture. Closing anastomoses in swine with
mechanical sutures provides the advantage of avoiding the need to puncture the
intestinal wall within the cavity, reducing the danger of peritoneal cavity
contamination, even though the findings were not statistically significant.
Author(S) Details
Marcos A. P. Fernandes
Institute of Obesity and Advanced Video Laparoscopic Surgery of Petropolis, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Bruno M. T. Pereira
Division of Trauma, University of Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
Sandra M. Guimarães
Institute of Obesity and Advanced Video Laparoscopic Surgery of Petropolis, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Aline Paganelli
Laboratório de Patologia Micron Cell Diagnóstico, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Carlos Manoel C. T. Pereira
Institute of Obesity and Advanced Video Laparoscopic Surgery of Petropolis, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Bruno M. T. Pereira
Division of Trauma, University of Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
View Book:- https://stm.bookpi.org/NHMMR-V1/article/view/6188
Comments
Post a Comment